When it came to news that “Sex and the City” without Samantha Jones’ character was getting a 10-episode revival on HBO Max – that’s apparently because Kim Catterall has repeatedly clarified that she will be making her character Will be available to revive. Never – The universe of a reboot’s potential audience divided into two surety camps: those who realize Samantha Jones put all the good sex in the “SATC” and everyone who still identifies as “Carrie” And they don’t think they are telling themselves.
For a lot of viewers like me, Samantha’s sex-positive banquet was the only reason to see a show set in New York City’s most white potential version. Aside from a fundamentally flawed understanding about the financial reality of being the author of a single newspaper column living in Manhattan – Carrie couldn’t afford that apartment, never mind all those shoes and clothes; I’ll Die on This Hill – the show’s writers struggle to balance their theoretically feminist narrative with the growing inevitability to make their hero their sole heroine.
This is because, for a show about more than 30 single women, their friendship and their lives, Samantha was consistently honest with her colleagues (and herself) about her wishes and her limitations.
And – despite what is ultimately written in the films and considered Canonical as the “Terminator” for the series – Samantha’s partner, Smith, is one of the show’s best men. She was charming, supportive through her cancer and most respected her needs and desires at every turn.
Roughly other people have dated friends for a long time – only dated them for an episode or two – highlighting big reasons to never date in New York.
The question for the reboot is whether it can still be “Sex and the City” if one does not have sex because the children will not go to bed.
And yet, Carrie not only kept trying to find a long-term partner from the debris that had passed in and out of her life; She continued to inspire others to do the same. Samantha was the only one who pursued sex – just sex – for her own sake and wounding someone she liked on her own terms and who she liked on her own terms.
Carrie’s inconsiderate approach to dating and relationships gave a raft of advice if she wanted happiness with colleagues who would appear at the altar. Aiden – the man Carrie used and then cheated with Big – is the only one who seemingly deserved to make any changes in a woman’s life. (He recovered; he regretted that decision.)
But Carrie’s advice meant that Miranda gave up her independence, her apartment, and her happiness to a man who ultimately could not find allegiance with a map. Charlett didn’t take Carrie’s advice a second time and found happiness with her (we mean to believe) small, ugly divorce lawyer – who was also kind and funny and loved her. But, despite Charlotte’s best efforts, there was nothing particularly interesting about her life after the children – although it is indeed in question whether there was anything particularly interesting about her life before the children , Either.
The question for the reboot is whether it can still be “Sex and the City” if one is not having sex because the children will not go to bed. Goodness knows, without Samantha, there is much less sex and many more conclusive monologues.
In its original incarnation, the show largely lacked material that made it worthy of a return to its universe, in fact, the exception of Samantha.
Worse for viewers, Carrie’s story and her friends are basically about the extreme privilege of white women in an economically stratified, racially segregated city.
Carrie reacted to a life failure – after being repeatedly betrayed by Iden to help her buy her apartment and a house next door, she was being intimidated and revamped with it – taking real accountability Instead of telling about the financial success of his friends. For her bad decisions until one of them (Charlett) takes her out. Miranda (for some inexplicable reason) threw herself into co-parenting and then a marriage with Steve despite her innumerable faults – her inability to remain faithful – but she did not see “Mother Track” again without seeing the law. Maintained a high-flying career. “Or dealing with any real childcare concerns. Carrie’s career always overtook her never-ending relationship drama, but, because poverty is for other people – which we don’t see in most shows – its But there is hardly any effect.
In its original incarnation, the show largely lacked material, making it a return to its universe, in fact, the exception of Samantha – a self-made career woman who pursued sexual pleasure with both women and men , Which would be today’s standard, pioneers; Survived both the possibility of marriage and children; smoked weed; Lack of body; And the survivors lived, first, through breast cancer and then menopause without giving a social message that proclaims older women as indiscriminate or immoral.
And the character who is not returning for more than 50 version of “SATC”.
The show is basically about the extreme privilege of white women in an economically stratified, racially segregated city.
So, what’s left? This is clearly not going to be joyous for Samantha (if something like that exists); Clear chain open for authors With samantha’s death – She had breast cancer, after all – which would not make for a fun or enjoyable watch. And even though his absence is explained in somewhat less depressing fashion, the problem is that the show relies on a framing of New York City as a predominantly white playground where the only occasional guest star is a paper bag. Deeper than.
It is not necessary to see Cynthia Nixon’s Running Mirror for public office (and her loss) in Miranda, unless the show is well acted with Gentrification – especially in Brooklyn, where she moved towards the end of the series Went. Charlotte married her Jewish divorce lawyer and raised Jewish children, who might have meaningfully addressed the rising tide of antisemitism – but she was part of a nebulize fundraiser for millions affected by Kovid. Is likely to show some more attention to art. -19 and how would Carrie write about the terrible hardships of marrying a rich white man – or has he moved on to publish slim fictional novels of life in the city that are not the same as the lives of most people in the city?
Watching Carrie, Miranda and Charlotte (Santha Santha) connect with the events of 2021 – which would involve race and racism – only to force them to when they were going to be honest about what they were How privileged and how much clarity there was for years. Outside his carefully constructed bubble of wealth in his interactions with the world. But Samantha was usually the only one who was truly honest in herself and her journey – and held others to the most difficult account. America has gone through an incredibly difficult couple of years, and I can think of nothing less relaxing than returning to the same old whitewashed fantasies of big city life.