Is Georgia’s upcoming poll ‘audit’ a recount?

Georgia says it is voting with about 5 million ballots cast in its very close presidential election on November. 3. But is it a recount? Audit “? And why are they doing this?

All of this is a bit confusing, but election experts say the results of what is happening in Georgia are unlikely to change and are warning that anomalies are likely to occur in the final vote. This does not mean that anything untoward happened. Experts say some discrepancies are expected when so many votes are counted for the second time using a completely different method – hand versus machine.

While President Donald Trump is making unfounded claims of fraud as he challenges the election results, Georgia’s Secretary of State, Brad Rafsper, has defended the work of election officials in the state, saying the review likely to change the outcome Was not. Informal results show Democrat Joe Biden leading Trump by about 14,000 votes.

Here’s more:

Is this an official count?

No. State election officials have said that this is not a statement, but a post-election audit.

The main difference between the two: In an election, a coherence is usually associated with close spacing, while post-election audits are routine and used by states to ensure that counting devices are counted. And processes can all work properly.

For example, in Georgia, a single scout is used that reads and lengthens previously released informal results. And recruitment in Georgia typically occurs after the election results are certified by the state. This has not happened yet. Once the election is certified, a following candidate may request a request if the margin is less than 0.5 percent. Biden currently leads by 0.28 percentage points, so Trump can still request a request later.

So what is Georgia doing?

The post-election audit is being held under a new state law that requires the race for the selection of the secretary of state to be held for the first time this year. Raffensparger said that he “opted for the presidency given the national importance of this race and the culmination of this race.”

The specific type of audit chosen by Georgia is known as “risk-limiting”. This involves checking the paper ballot against the machine poles to ensure the accuracy of those machines. This year Georgia used a fleet of ballot-marking, voting machines for the first time, producing a paper record of every ballot cast in person.

Risk-limited audits usually begin with an initial sample of the ballot. This sample is found to increase depending on the level of anomalies. Such an audit ends when either the election officials reach a certain level of confidence that the result is correct or that a complete calculation has been made. This is not meant to produce results that are an exact match to the previous match.

But Georgia election officials say they will review every ballot to begin with. They say it will be easier for county officials to manage because a large number of ballots and close margins can result in every ballot result anyway.

Was it motivated by allegations of fraud?

No. Ransparger has repeatedly said that his office has seen no evidence of widespread fraud with the November 3 election. A top official said on Thursday that the point of the audit was “thoroughly scanned the ballots to show the equipment and the count we got made perfect sense.”

Nevertheless, the high stakes surrounding the decision are hard to ignore.

Before announcing the decision to conduct the audit, Trump’s colleagues in the state sent Raffensparger, a fellow Republican, a letter requesting that he order a hand recount before certifying the results. State election officials have said that the decision to conduct the audit was being discussed before the letter.

In addition, Rafensparger has faced calls for two Georgia senators to resign, with both Trump supporters facing close runoff elections that could determine which party controls the US Senate next year Does.

When does it start, and how soon will we know its outcome?

Counties must begin the process before 9 a.m. on Friday, a week before the state deadline to certify the election.

The state is asking for the counties to complete hand matching by 11:59 a.m. Wednesday, a tight change. Representatives from each party will be allowed to watch the process, although they will not be allowed to challenge any ballot.

State election officials said they would not issue an interim length after the completion of the hand line.

Can votes be changed?

Yes. The office of both election experts and Georgia’s Secretary of State have stated that the lengthy final vote would almost certainly be different from previously unofficial results. Gabriel Sterling told the secretary’s office, “The result will, in the end, change little more than likely.”

Hand counts are generally less reliable than machine counts, according to election expert Larry Norden of the Brennan Center for Justice. “Humans make mistakes,” says Norden, adding that the margin between Biden and Trump did not mean that the overall result would change. “It’s very unlikely that you’re going to find enough discrepancies to cross 14,000 votes.” Are, and that’s what matters at the end of the day. “

State election officials have said that the result at hand will eventually be used to authenticate the election.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *