A Judicial Department report stated that the FBI wanted to arrest Jeffrey Epstein while he was organizing a beauty contest seven months earlier in the Virgin Islands.
A 347-page report obtained by NBC News released an executive summary Thursday of an investigation into Egstein’s more than a decade-old sexual abuse. The Justice Department’s Office of Professional Responsibility found that former Labor Secretary Alex Acosta, who supervised the case as a top federal prosecutor in Florida in the mid-2000s, exercised “poor judgment” but engaged in malpractice Were not.
The entire report tells a prosecutor as a colleague that the FBI wanted to arrest him [Epstein] In [the] Virgin Islands during a beauty contest … where she is a judge. “
The report stated, “The case agent recalled that he and his co-case agents were disappointed” about being denied the opportunity to make an arrest in May and 2007, and an FBI observer said that The case was “extremely disturbing”.
It was not until a year later, in 2008, that Epstein surrendered to the authorities after signing a petition. That the FBI wanted to bring charges against Epstein in 2007, but the agency’s interest in arresting him at a beauty contest in Virgin Island has not been reported previously.
The politically connected financier was accused of sexually abusing dozens of teenagers at his West Palm Beach mansion. But she eventually pleaded guilty to state charges related to a single victim in a solo hunt that sentenced her to a long prison term.
Epstein eventually spent 13 months in prison and was allowed to leave almost every day through a work release program. He died by committing suicide inside a federal prison last year while awaiting trial on new gender trafficking charges.
The report states that the federal investigation began when Assistant US Attorney Mary Willfence told Acosta that she was willing to invest time and that the FBI was willing to invest money to investigate Epstein.
“But I didn’t want to go till the end and then [U.S. Attorney’s Office] To be intimidated by high-level lawyers “For Epstein, he said in an email included in the report.” I was convinced it would not happen. “
The villain wrote to the FBI in July 2007, nearly two months after the FBI arrested Epstein in the beauty pageant, “Now I think there’s a glass ceiling that prevents me from moving forward while evidence suggests that Epstein was in this criminal behavior is attached. . “
The report describes a one-year back-to-back communication between Willafana, Willfensa’s immediate supervisors, and Acosta himself, a cadre of Epstein lawyers, some of whom have been filed in court before. This includes summaries of interviews with FBI agents, emails and written documents about the case.
Villafanassa told the Department of Justice that she believed Acosta was “impressed by the stature of Epstein’s lawyers.”
“[O]This was one of the issues in the case. . . The report noted that the ability to defend is to describe the case or characterize the case as being legally complex. “It wasn’t legally as complicated as they made it out to be.”
But the report states that “neither Villafenasa nor any of the other individuals interviewed OPR, which suggests that any specific evidence was identified in Acosta, or any other subject, in the defense.” A personal relationship with the lawyer led to an unfair favor or benefit to Epstein. “
In a statement released on Thursday, Acosta said the report “fully maliciously alleges that the USAO improperly cut Epstein a ‘sweet-hearted deal’ or purposely investigates possible wrongdoings by various prominent individuals” Avoided doing. “
The report also raises new questions about what federal prosecutors thought of with the investigation of the original case by local prosecutors in Palm Beach.
In 2007, the federal prosecution wrote as the villain, “The state intentionally torpedoed it in a grand jury, so it was brought to us.”
Federal prosecutors had concerns about state prosecutor Barry Crusher at the time, the report suggests.
In an email, Acosta asked one of the case’s supervisors whether it would be appropriate to give Crissher a head as to how they would pursue the investigation. The report stated that the supervisor advised Krischer, “not out of fear that it would be leaked directly to Epstein.”
As the non-prosecution agreement was still under negotiation, Villafanassa wrote an email to Acosta describing the pain of the three alleged victims, who had recently been interviewed by investigators.
“One girl started sabotage so that we had to stop the interview twice in 20-minute intervals,” she wrote. “She composed him enough to continue for a short time, but he said he was having nightmares about Epstein and she started breaking up again. So we stopped the interview.”
“These girls are so much better than what I have received so far, and I hate the feeling that there is nothing I can do to help them,” said Willfensa.
Epstein’s attorney Ken Starr wrote a final email to Acosta at the conclusion of the case.
“While I am obviously very sad that I believe the government is treating my client [Epstein], A man whom I have come to admire deeply, I recognize that we have filed our ‘appellate motions’ and argued, “Starr said.
He said, “I would like to.” . . Something will be closed with you on this matter so that in the coming years, none of us will bother any sick with this matter. “
Jonathan dynast has contributed.